llmgauge

comparison

Llama 4 Maverick vs DeepSeek V4 Flash

Token pricing, context window and real monthly cost, side by side. DeepSeek V4 Flash is the cheaper of the two for a typical workload — about 2.0× less.

cheaper for a typical workload
DeepSeek V4 Flash
saves 50% vs Llama 4 Maverick at 1,500 in / 500 out × 200,000/mo
Llama 4 Maverick $140/mo
DeepSeek V4 Flash $70.00/mo
Mid vs Flagship a smaller technical class than Llama 4 Maverick — cheaper, but not a drop-in substitute

Positioned by published specs — size, context and modality — not measured performance; a smaller model can sometimes outperform a larger one on your task.

Cost versus technical classLlama 4 Maverick: $140/mo, Flagship class. DeepSeek V4 Flash: $70.00/mo, Mid class. Plotted by monthly cost (horizontal) against technical class from size and context (vertical).best valuepremiumbudgetoverpricedLlama 4 Maverick$140/mo · FlagshipDeepSeek V4 Flash$70.00/mo · Mid← lower cost · monthly $ · higher cost →
↑ technical class (size & context)
One class apart

Llama 4 Maverick is one class larger (Flagship vs Mid). Lean to the cheaper DeepSeek V4 Flash unless your task is demanding enough to need the larger class.

Llama 4 Maverick versus DeepSeek V4 Flash specifications and price.
metric Llama 4 Maverick DeepSeek V4 Flash
Input / 1M $0.20 $0.14
Output / 1M $0.80 $0.28
Context 1.0M 1.0M
Technical class Flagship Mid
Cost @ typical workload $140/mo $70.00/mo
Modality text + image Text only
Price source routed list
Provider Meta DeepSeek

Snapshot . Cost uses a typical workload; tune it in the calculator. How we measure →

Which should you pick?

On a typical workload, DeepSeek V4 Flash costs $70.00/mo against Llama 4 Maverick's $140/mo — roughly 2.0× cheaper. But the ranking depends on your output-to-input ratio: output is the pricier direction for both, so an output-heavy job (code generation, long answers) widens the gap while an input-heavy one (summarization, retrieval) narrows it. Both share the same context window, so that's not a deciding factor here. Only Llama 4 Maverick accepts image input — decisive if your prompts include images. By technical class (size and context, not measured capability), Llama 4 Maverick is a Flagship and DeepSeek V4 Flash a Mid — so the lower price partly reflects a smaller class, not just a discount.

These are list and routed market prices, not measured outcomes. Two models at the same rate can still cost different amounts to finish the same task, because verbose or reasoning-heavy models emit more tokens. That gap is exactly what measured cost-per-task captures. The technical-class read above is likewise spec-based — size, context and modality, not measured performance — so a smaller model can still outperform a larger one on your specific task.

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama 4 Maverick or DeepSeek V4 Flash cheaper?

For a typical workload (1,500 input + 500 output tokens × 200,000 requests/month), DeepSeek V4 Flash costs $70.00/mo versus $140/mo for Llama 4 Maverick — about 2.0× less. Because output is priced higher than input, the winner can flip if your workload writes much more or less than this; check your own numbers in the calculator.

What's the main difference between Llama 4 Maverick and DeepSeek V4 Flash?

On price, Llama 4 Maverick is $0.20/$0.80 per 1M (in/out) and DeepSeek V4 Flash is $0.14/$0.28. By technical class (size & context) it's Flagship (Llama 4 Maverick) versus Mid (DeepSeek V4 Flash). Both carry the same context window. Only Llama 4 Maverick accepts image input.

More comparisons

Related