comparison
Kimi K2 Thinking vs Llama 4 Maverick
Token pricing, context window and real monthly cost, side by side. Llama 4 Maverick is the cheaper of the two for a typical workload — about 4.1× less.
| metric | Kimi K2 Thinking | Llama 4 Maverick |
|---|---|---|
| Input / 1M | $0.60 | $0.15 |
| Output / 1M | $2.50 | $0.60 |
| Context | 262K | 1.0M |
| Cost @ typical workload | $430/mo | $105/mo |
| Modality | Text only | text + image |
| Price source | routed | routed |
| Provider | Moonshot | Meta |
Snapshot . Cost uses a typical workload; tune it in the calculator. How we measure →
Which should you pick?
On a typical workload, Llama 4 Maverick costs $105/mo against Kimi K2 Thinking's $430/mo — roughly 4.1× cheaper. But the ranking depends on your output-to-input ratio: output is the pricier direction for both, so an output-heavy job (code generation, long answers) widens the gap while an input-heavy one (summarization, retrieval) narrows it. If you need to fit more in a single prompt, Llama 4 Maverick has the larger 1.0M-token window (~1,573 pages). Only Llama 4 Maverick accepts image input — decisive if your prompts include images.
These are list and routed market prices, not measured outcomes. Two models at the same rate can still cost different amounts to finish the same task, because verbose or reasoning-heavy models emit more tokens. That gap is exactly what measured cost-per-task captures.
Frequently asked questions
Is Kimi K2 Thinking or Llama 4 Maverick cheaper?
For a typical workload (1,500 input + 500 output tokens × 200,000 requests/month), Llama 4 Maverick costs $105/mo versus $430/mo for Kimi K2 Thinking — about 4.1× less. Because output is priced higher than input, the winner can flip if your workload writes much more or less than this; check your own numbers in the calculator.
What's the main difference between Kimi K2 Thinking and Llama 4 Maverick?
On price, Kimi K2 Thinking is $0.60/$2.50 per 1M (in/out) and Llama 4 Maverick is $0.15/$0.60. Llama 4 Maverick has the larger context window at 1.0M tokens. Llama 4 Maverick also accepts image input, while Kimi K2 Thinking is text-only.
More comparisons
- GPT-5.4 mini vs Kimi K2 Thinking
- GPT-5.4 nano vs Llama 4 Maverick
- Kimi K2 Thinking vs GPT-5.4 nano
- Llama 4 Maverick vs gpt-oss-120b
- Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Kimi K2 Thinking
- Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Kimi K2 Thinking
Related
- Kimi K2 Thinking and Llama 4 Maverick — full specs and price history.
- API cost calculator — compare on your own workload.
- All comparisons — the full head-to-head index.