comparison

Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Gemini 2.5 Pro

Token pricing, context window and real monthly cost, side by side. Gemini 2.5 Pro is the cheaper of the two for a typical workload — about 1.3× less.

cheaper for a typical workload
Gemini 2.5 Pro
saves 24% vs Gemini 3.1 Pro at 1,500 in / 500 out × 200,000/mo
Gemini 3.1 Pro $1,800/mo
Gemini 2.5 Pro $1,375/mo
Gemini 3.1 Pro versus Gemini 2.5 Pro specifications and price.
metric Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro
Input / 1M $2.00 $1.25
Output / 1M $12.00 $10.00
Context 1.0M 1.0M
Cost @ typical workload $1,800/mo $1,375/mo
Modality text + image + audio + video text + image + audio + video
Price source list list
Provider Google Google

Snapshot . Cost uses a typical workload; tune it in the calculator. How we measure →

Which should you pick?

On a typical workload, Gemini 2.5 Pro costs $1,375/mo against Gemini 3.1 Pro's $1,800/mo — roughly 1.3× cheaper. But the ranking depends on your output-to-input ratio: output is the pricier direction for both, so an output-heavy job (code generation, long answers) widens the gap while an input-heavy one (summarization, retrieval) narrows it. Both share the same context window, so that's not a deciding factor here.

These are list and routed market prices, not measured outcomes. Two models at the same rate can still cost different amounts to finish the same task, because verbose or reasoning-heavy models emit more tokens. That gap is exactly what measured cost-per-task captures.

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 3.1 Pro or Gemini 2.5 Pro cheaper?

For a typical workload (1,500 input + 500 output tokens × 200,000 requests/month), Gemini 2.5 Pro costs $1,375/mo versus $1,800/mo for Gemini 3.1 Pro — about 1.3× less. Because output is priced higher than input, the winner can flip if your workload writes much more or less than this; check your own numbers in the calculator.

What's the main difference between Gemini 3.1 Pro and Gemini 2.5 Pro?

On price, Gemini 3.1 Pro is $2.00/$12.00 per 1M (in/out) and Gemini 2.5 Pro is $1.25/$10.00. Both carry the same context window.

More comparisons

Related