comparison
DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Llama 4 Maverick
Token pricing, context window and real monthly cost, side by side. Llama 4 Maverick is the cheaper of the two for a typical workload — about 1.6× less.
Positioned by published specs — size, context and modality — not measured performance; a smaller model can sometimes outperform a larger one on your task.
Llama 4 Maverick and DeepSeek V4 Pro are the same class (Flagship) on size & context, so they're plausible substitutes — decide on price, modality and provider fit.
| metric | DeepSeek V4 Pro | Llama 4 Maverick |
|---|---|---|
| Input / 1M | $0.43 | $0.20 |
| Output / 1M | $0.87 | $0.80 |
| Context | 1.0M | 1.0M |
| Technical class | Flagship | Flagship |
| Cost @ typical workload | $217/mo | $140/mo |
| Modality | Text only | text + image |
| Price source | list | routed |
| Provider | DeepSeek | Meta |
Snapshot . Cost uses a typical workload; tune it in the calculator. How we measure →
Which should you pick?
On a typical workload, Llama 4 Maverick costs $140/mo against DeepSeek V4 Pro's $217/mo — roughly 1.6× cheaper. But the ranking depends on your output-to-input ratio: output is the pricier direction for both, so an output-heavy job (code generation, long answers) widens the gap while an input-heavy one (summarization, retrieval) narrows it. Both share the same context window, so that's not a deciding factor here. Only Llama 4 Maverick accepts image input — decisive if your prompts include images. By technical class — a spec read of size and context, not measured capability — both are Flagship, so this is a like-for-like price decision.
These are list and routed market prices, not measured outcomes. Two models at the same rate can still cost different amounts to finish the same task, because verbose or reasoning-heavy models emit more tokens. That gap is exactly what measured cost-per-task captures. The technical-class read above is likewise spec-based — size, context and modality, not measured performance — so a smaller model can still outperform a larger one on your specific task.
Frequently asked questions
Is DeepSeek V4 Pro or Llama 4 Maverick cheaper?
For a typical workload (1,500 input + 500 output tokens × 200,000 requests/month), Llama 4 Maverick costs $140/mo versus $217/mo for DeepSeek V4 Pro — about 1.6× less. Because output is priced higher than input, the winner can flip if your workload writes much more or less than this; check your own numbers in the calculator.
What's the main difference between DeepSeek V4 Pro and Llama 4 Maverick?
On price, DeepSeek V4 Pro is $0.43/$0.87 per 1M (in/out) and Llama 4 Maverick is $0.20/$0.80. By technical class (size & context) they're the same — both Flagship. Both carry the same context window. Only Llama 4 Maverick accepts image input.
More comparisons
- GPT-5.4 nano vs DeepSeek V4 Pro
- GPT-5.4 nano vs Llama 4 Maverick
- Llama 4 Maverick vs gpt-oss-120b
- Gemini 2.5 Flash vs DeepSeek V4 Pro
- Gemini 2.5 Flash vs Llama 4 Maverick
- DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Related
- DeepSeek V4 Pro and Llama 4 Maverick — full specs and price history.
- API cost calculator — compare on your own workload.
- All comparisons — the full head-to-head index.