comparison
Claude Fable 5 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro
Token pricing, context window and real monthly cost, side by side. Gemini 3.1 Pro is the cheaper of the two for a typical workload — about 4.4× less.
Positioned by published specs — size, context and modality — not measured performance; a smaller model can sometimes outperform a larger one on your task.
Gemini 3.1 Pro and Claude Fable 5 are the same class (Flagship) on size & context, so they're plausible substitutes — decide on price, modality and provider fit.
| metric | Claude Fable 5 | Gemini 3.1 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Input / 1M | $10.00 | $2.00 |
| Output / 1M | $50.00 | $12.00 |
| Context | 1M | 1.0M |
| Technical class | Flagship | Flagship |
| Cost @ typical workload | $8,000/mo | $1,800/mo |
| Modality | text + image | text + image + audio + video |
| Price source | list | list |
| Provider | Anthropic |
Snapshot . Cost uses a typical workload; tune it in the calculator. How we measure →
Which should you pick?
On a typical workload, Gemini 3.1 Pro costs $1,800/mo against Claude Fable 5's $8,000/mo — roughly 4.4× cheaper. But the ranking depends on your output-to-input ratio: output is the pricier direction for both, so an output-heavy job (code generation, long answers) widens the gap while an input-heavy one (summarization, retrieval) narrows it. If you need to fit more in a single prompt, Gemini 3.1 Pro has the larger 1.0M-token window (~1,573 pages). By technical class — a spec read of size and context, not measured capability — both are Flagship, so this is a like-for-like price decision.
These are list and routed market prices, not measured outcomes. Two models at the same rate can still cost different amounts to finish the same task, because verbose or reasoning-heavy models emit more tokens. That gap is exactly what measured cost-per-task captures. The technical-class read above is likewise spec-based — size, context and modality, not measured performance — so a smaller model can still outperform a larger one on your specific task.
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude Fable 5 or Gemini 3.1 Pro cheaper?
For a typical workload (1,500 input + 500 output tokens × 200,000 requests/month), Gemini 3.1 Pro costs $1,800/mo versus $8,000/mo for Claude Fable 5 — about 4.4× less. Because output is priced higher than input, the winner can flip if your workload writes much more or less than this; check your own numbers in the calculator.
What's the main difference between Claude Fable 5 and Gemini 3.1 Pro?
On price, Claude Fable 5 is $10.00/$50.00 per 1M (in/out) and Gemini 3.1 Pro is $2.00/$12.00. By technical class (size & context) they're the same — both Flagship. Gemini 3.1 Pro has the larger context window at 1.0M tokens.
Why is Gemini 3.1 Pro so much cheaper than Claude Fable 5?
Gemini 3.1 Pro has a much lower per-token rate — $12.00/1M output versus $50.00. The headline rate isn't the whole story, though: a verbose model can cost more to finish a task than its rate implies — that's what measured cost-per-task captures.
More comparisons
- Claude Fable 5 vs GPT-5.5
- GPT-5.5 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro
- Claude Fable 5 vs GPT-5.4
- GPT-5.4 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro
- Gemini 3.1 Pro vs GPT-5.4 mini
- Claude Fable 5 vs Claude Opus 4.8
Related
- Claude Fable 5 and Gemini 3.1 Pro — full specs and price history.
- API cost calculator — compare on your own workload.
- All comparisons — the full head-to-head index.